1 reviewer report received scientific reports. 1 The desk rejection; 20.

1 reviewer report received scientific reports This is why the editor decided with only one referee report. Speaking to that first point- I had an experience reviewing a paper for Sci Reports where myself and another reviewer raised major concerns with the author's methods and conclusions In one study, the top reasons cited by reviewers for getting involved included that scientific peer review (1) serves as a means for the reviewer to be an active participant in their scientific community, (2) is important for reciprocating the peer review that others have performed for the reviewer's own work, (3) is expected of researchers This paper uses a retrospective analysis of available reviewer reports to catalogue common errors identified during refereeing of 50 pre-publication manuscripts in the form of original research papers submitted to 7 indexed journals. Indeed Reviewers assess the technical soundness and scientific validity of your methods, analysis, and interpretation, all of which must be appropriate, properly conducted, ethically robust, and fully supported by the data. Asking when you will come to a decision, given that one referee report is already received. Stage 1: Initial manuscript submission and review. is novel and/or significant enough in content to be published, and c. The editor replied five days later stating that he If the manuscript is transferred, the original reviewer reports and identities will be shared with the receiving journal (with the exception of transfers to the npj Series and Scientific Reports Reviewer’s Report Template for Case Reports Reviewer’s Report Template for Case Reports After receiving an invitation for review, you will have access to the following platform to download and review the case report. In some journals with open peer review the reviewers’ reports are published alongside the article. « Author» near the upper left of the screen 2. Editorial and publishing policies. Characteristics of peer review process . I sent an email to inquire about it, and they said they couldn't find the second reviewer. After you login please select: 1. Research conducted to a high standard should not be rejected on the basis of not containing positive results alone. Scientific Reports being an open access journal I feel contributed to the paper being featured in many media outlets – including news and video sites – immediately after publication, and Scientific Reports will accept anything that reviewers agree is scientifically sound. Here is the full timeline : Reviews received 18 Apr, 2022; Reviewers agreed On 16 Apr, 2022 Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor of 3. Health Sci Rep. For a number of years, one way we have done this is via an opt-in arrangement with Clarivate and their Reviewer Recognition Service (RRS). In your Our editors rate all of the reviewer reports we receive on a scale of 1–5, with 5 representing a reviewer report of outstanding quality. After your submission, an associate editor at the journal sends your paper to peer reviewers; for Scientific Reports, the submitted paper is typically sent to two or three peer reviewers. 20. Article. 1 Characterizing positive feedback in reviewer reports 4. Based on the status you ’ re seeing now, During peer review, reviewers will be able to access your manuscript securely using our online system, whilst maintaining referee anonymity. Reviewers must maintain the confidentiality of the manuscript, including the abstract. For reviewers who have completed our Peer Review Excellence training, the threshold The peer review status of my submitted paper currently indicates "Reviews completed: 1; Review invitations accepted: 1, Review invitations sent: 2+". 10 Submission 6. I submitted it through the new system, where they state that within a maximum of 45 days, they shall provide a response from the reviewers. It encompasses a wide spectrum of subjects spanning Biology (all organisms), Biodiversity, Evolution and Population Genetics, Genetics, Biological Anthropology, Botany, Medical Sciences, Veterinary Sciences, Biometry, When the article is sent out for peer review, reviewers will receive more specific information about the format of the article, which they need to take into account during peer-review. 15 Major revision The current status I'm in is "1 reviewer report received," and this status has been ongoing for more than ten days. Editors take many factors into consideration when deciding whether Writing your comments on the reviewer report. Then the editor sent it again to 6 more referees. 0 (moderate) Average number of review reports 2. After peer review, you may know how you want to proceed with the manuscript. At stage 2, reviewers consider the full study, including results and interpretation. com> Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 3:20 PM. What's surprising is that after spending 1 month in the "Reviews received" state, I'm back in the "Editor invited" state, just like in the first week of my submission. Registered Reports are a publication format in which the research question and the quality of methodology are peer reviewed before the data are collected and analysed. After that, the status has been ‘Waiting for Editor's Decision’ for a while. Accounting information is communicated to . My question: In situations where one reviewer's report is complete, will the editor typically base the initial decision on the sole completed review, or will they wait for both reports to be In most of my papers Reviewer #1 comments very favourably, however Reviewer #2 doesn’t. However, we observed little progress in the assessment phase of Health Science Reports is a broad scope open access journal publishing research and commentaries across all medical and health sciences disciplines, including clinical care, public health, and epidemiology. On May 1, one expert accepted the review, and on May 4, the system showed that one expert's opinion was received. Stage 1 review: Reviewers evaluate study proposals before data are Please include a brief scientific case for consideration and an estimated timeline for completing the Author and reviewer guidelines. Authors who have had their paper rejected always blame the reviewers. A two-step procedure was used to analyze the data. If the proposal is accepted, then journals commit to publishing the findings regardless of the results, so long as the research As work to improve health through the publication and dissemination of important health science research, we look forward to your participation as an author, reviewer, reader, or even better—all three! Montenegro‐Montero A, Young C. reported that the absence of accompanying reviewers report at the time of receiving the funding outcome heightened the desire to switch. These concepts are also summarized in a reviewer checklist that can be used in real-time to develop and double-check one's reviewer report before submitting it. At Stage 2, reviewers consider the full study, including results and interpretation. And once you have reviewers they often evaluate the paper very one sided (e. Timely Review Reports. Reviewer on Receivables. Open science. Course: Authors should also pause before reacting emotionally to the language in a reviewer report. Full-text available. This link will take you to a full breakdown of the Reviewer report ratings. Journals may vary in the format required for the review. I have a manuscript under review at Nature Scientific Reports. There is currently no consensus about how to assess the quality of reviewer reports (Sizo, Lino, & Rocha, 2018; van I thought that is reasonable since some will not be available etc. While editors do take reports seriously, they do not always accept the recommendation of the reviewers, particularly when two or more reviewers have diverse opinions. Our policies After receiving peer reviewer comments (2 positive, 1 negative), this was my letter of appeal sent to Science Advances on the decision made to reject my manuscript entitled "The N-end Rule Pathway 19. However, for Scientific Reports, it’s typically two or three. it has been considered for peer review. 15状态变为1 Reviewer(s) accepted，之后每个月这个时间都会更新，但状态一直没有改变。期间发过一次邮件询问进度，然而编辑没有回复，目前已经5个月了，请问是否需要继续等待，还是撤稿改投呢？ Q. 目前状态1 Reviewer report received ，之前只有一个审稿人接，是不是还得等第二第三个审稿人接呀？ 登录 / 去注册. 2. They are more likely to be cited by other scientists if they are helpful rather than I submitted a manuscript to Scientific Reports, and revision was required by two reviewers. Partners. Finding reviewers generally takes some time as reviewers are busy researchers themselves. 0 Overall rating manuscript handling. 出版年份：2011 年文章数：160514 投稿命中率： 开通期刊会员，数据随心看. Criticism expressed in robust language is not necessarily unfair. Our editors rate all of the reviewer reports we receive on a scale of 1–5, with 5 representing a reviewer report of outstanding quality. (Journal received: 5 Aug. Scientific Reports. Scientific Reports <srep@nature. Scientific Reports is a respected journal and no one will think worse of your paper for it being published there. FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING (FAR) Midterm Exam Reviewer. Detailed performance statistics are provided for each Reviewer, along with a link to more detailed information about each Reviewer. Submitting your work to us is quick and straightforward using Snapp. Policies. Dear Dr Zairina, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to Scientific Reports. falls within the scope of the journal b. 1. It doesn't need to be the hottest topic or use the most up-to-date tech. 0 Editors match reviewers to articles based on previous publications, and expertise in the area. In the IOP's article tracking system, the status changed from "1st reviewer agreed to report" to "Editorial Assessment" instead of "All reviewer reports received". Advice on how to assess a manuscript and write a useful reviewer report. The BMJ is the appropriate place to publish because it can reach each of these target groups. peer-review; Share. Scientific Reports is the 5th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 734,000 citations in 2023*, and receives widespread attention in policy documents and the media. 1 Your rebuttal as an open document High quality peer review sits at the heart of our editorial process, and we are deeply grateful to those researchers who give their time and effort to review on behalf of Scientific Reports. When referee reports are received, an Editor will make an initial decision along the following lines: How we rate reviewer reports Our editors rate all of the reviewer reports we receive on a scale of 1–5, with 5 representing a report of outstanding quality. Any article that has problems with any of the above criteria [] Read 722 answers by scientists with 2 recommendations from their colleagues to the question asked by Mahfuz Judeh on Apr 14, 2014 before preparing your written report. For instance, some journals may utilize a scoring tool for which reviewers rate various aspects of the manuscript or some may require completion of a specific questionnaire (Citation 5, Citation 7). My question is how In situations where one reviewer's report is complete, will the editor typically base the initial decision on the sole completed review, or will they wait for both reports to be finalized? Scientific Reports is an online peer-reviewed open access scientific mega journal published by Nature Research, covering all areas of the natural sciences. . is clear and consistent enough in its presentation to be understood. Reviewer Certificate This certificate is awarded to in recognition of their contribution to Dr. Snapp has a number of tracking and reporting capabilities that allow you to view the status of individual submissions and help you prioritise tasks on the submissions assigned to you. Subscription receivable that is collectible 15 months after the reporting date d. The search strategy contains the following steps: 1 Royal Society Open Science will automatically offer Stage 1 in-principle acceptance (IPA) to any quantitative Stage 1 Registered Report within the journal’s subject scope that receives IPA at Peer Community In (PCI) Registered Reports, and will accept without further peer review any Stage 2 Registered Report that has been recommended by PCI Reviewer 2 Report. To accept or decline the invitation follow the link in the email. 1 The desk rejection; 20. Article within a journal (no page numbers) Review reports. Scientific report • Scientific papers are for sharing your own original research work with other scientists or for reviewing the research conducted by others • To reach their goal, papers must aim to inform, not impress. Theories within 18 months after the reporting date. 08], k = 16 journals) and among these Editors are responsible for making manuscript decisions based upon reviewer reports and their own reading of the manuscript. Comments to the author/s. These Registered Reports reviewer Springer Nature works to make the role of peer review easier and enjoyable. (lines 42-47) Having been an editor or AE for several journals, I agree that most reviews are poor. At the submission stage, authors may indicate a Peer reviewers are accountable for the accuracy and views expressed in their reports, and the peer review process operates on a principle of mutual trust between authors, reviewers and After 1 round we resubmitted and 3 reviewers (2 from before and 1 new) checked the manuscript and accept for publication was the final decision. I received back the reviewer comments together with a note from the editor asking me (as the first author) to revise and resubmit within 4 weeks (exact wording below*). Certification Peer Review Excellence Rating Summary Detailed description Use in decision making 5 Outstanding— exceptionally detailed and adds valuable insight when informing decision PEER REVIEW REPORT GOAL: A peer review report has two purposes, and two different audiences. To: elida-z@ff. 灰色头像Vae 2023-05-29 Excuse me, do you know for how long? Also, it seems that it only took around 8 or 9 days from the start of the review process to receiving the "Reviewer's Report Received/Ready for Editor Decision" today. If, upon receiving an Open peer review—where authors and reviewers are aware of each other’s identity. See a screenshot of a Reviewer Performance Report . We welcome clinical studies, Hello, I've been in the process with Scientific Reports for a few months now. The peer review process helps editors to decide what to publish, and it ensures the When you receive a request to act as a reviewer, you should consider the following questions. unair. c. Scientific Reports’ approach in publishing technically sound work and let the wider scientific community determine the impact of the work is well received by like-minded researchers including Financial Accounting AND Reporting 1 Reviewer. Wadhah Edrees 1 manuscript in 2024 for Scientific Reports Discover the world's research 25+ million In this paper we focus on one such methodological reform: the adoption of registered reports (RRs). 279-293 (2014) Common Errors in Scientific Paper Submissions: A Reviewer’s Report S. Home; Hooray! We have received reports from referees on your manuscript. It has been almost 2 months now, so I sent an email asking about it, and received the following reply: "The Editorial Board Member who is handling your submission initially had some difficulty securing referees who were available to review your manuscript, but I am pleased to say that your 7 weeks ago I submitted my first manuscript to Scientific Reports. 1 for examples of articles and their history of submissions and exchanged among the authors, reviewers, and the editor. The ERC Executive Agency’s Scientific Officers will assess your scientific reports and may contact you to request additional Although sometimes the deadline set by journals might seem unreasonably tight, peer review is one step of many to navigate in the convoluted path to getting a paper published, and often the time allowed for a reviewer to submit their report has been optimised based on careful analysis of previously submitted reports. With Snapp being developed in-house and with the academic community, our dedicated product team can guide, design and support its development to ensure it meets the changing needs of authors, editors and reviewers. Finally, the editor in We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. 2018;1:e15 10. Therefore, it is absolutely normal for the manuscript status to remain “reviewer invited” for a few weeks. The Editors may welcome suggestions for specific referees from you or your co-authors in some cases. Surprisingly, in each case, the assigned editor prioritises Reviewer #2 comments and rejects the paper. In considering papers at Stage 1, reviewers will be asked to assess: 1. Frontier Scientific Publishing aims to provide an efficient and high quality publishing service to authors and to the scientific community. The search was carried out using combinations of keywords such as: “reviewing review”, “review assessment”, “review rating”, “quality review”, “assessment of reviewers’ reports”, “reviewers’ review” and “peer review”. If you don't have permissions to make the decision, your recommendation is passed to the lead editor. These are the criteria to have a reviewer report rated 5 out of 5: Criteria Level to be rated 5 [] Peer reviewing. The scientific reliability is further discussed below with reference to the consort statement for reporting of randomised controlled trials. In this sense, the question was a logical one. Cambridge UP, SAGE). My Edit: I got a very harsh (and unjustified) referee report. If you are a Lead Editor, you also have oversight of all submissions to your journal and ways to identify those that may need attention. Click here to read the full breakdown of the reviewer report ratings. Journal info (provided by editor) Difficulty of reviewer comments 2. Follow It is not uncommon to receive a decision based on a single reviewer report. The above report As the corresponding or submitting author, you can track the progress of your article online via Your research (login required). Librarians 20 Receiving the editor’s decision; 20. This is irrelevant to time given to make revisions or anything. Download a certificate of your reviewing activity for Nature Research journals. Am J Sci. Registered reports were first implemented in 2013 by Chris The review process for Registered Reports is divided into two stages. Please remember to use appropriate language in your comments for the author. Be sure to review the journal’s instructions for preparing and submitting Reviewer report ratings Our editors rate the reviewer reports we receive on a scale of 1 to 5. What should be the About Scientific Reports 1 review reports have been received The Board Member selects and invites suitable reviewers who meet Scientific Reports’ requirements If deemed suitable, the Editor will select referees for your paper, based on their scientific interests and background. Ref: Submission ID 96731955-9d30-4781-a3fd-3ea6490a45a2. The evaluation will be based on the structure, constructiveness, and usefulness of the report, not the scientific content. However, in the ScholarOne Manuscript System, the status changed from "Awaiting Referee Reports" to "Awaiting Decision". Manuscript got reviewed by 2-2 reviewers, One reviewer gave critical review which was well defended by the authors, but the editor showed his monopoly and even after challenging his decision, he has Amidst the ever-expanding realm of scientific production and the proliferation of predatory journals, the focus on peer review remains paramount for scientometricians and sociologists of science. Accountancy (ACTG01) money spent REVENUE - total amount of income PROFIT - financial gain a business receives when revenue surpasses costs and expenses CAPITAL - cash or liquid assets being held or obtained for expenditures. I experienced this with several respectable publishers (e. During the period, I sent an email to ask about the progress, but the editor did not reply. Timely Review Reports: If you received no specific instructions, the reviewer report should be divided into two parts: comments to be read only by the editor, and; These usually have to do with the manuscript’s scientific soundness, novelty, quality, importance, and suitability for the journal. On 15th Feb the status changed to "Reviewer(s) Accepted". Below is a summary of what each Training and rating means. In the majority of cases, at least two reports will be received which are broadly in agreement, making it possible to assess reviewer comments easily and reach a straightforward decision. The challenges of developing scientific literacy continue into higher education, where learners must learn to read and interpret original research articles, which may be even less accessible than There is now an option to opt in and receive an evaluation of your reviewer report. These are the criteria to have a report rated 5 out of 5: Thoroughness Criteria Feedback quality Recommendation a dashboard that provides an overview of each submission and tasks available to you showing submitted manuscripts and available actions ; an integrated reviewer finder that makes it easier to find and invite relevant reviewers; automated reminders and notifications to help keep work on track; templated emails, saving you time; structured reviewer report forms to ensure consistency The Reviewer Performance Report provides a summary of Reviewer activity for all submissions received during the selected time period. For further information and guidance on making editorial decisions we encourage you to attend our Fundamentals for Editors: On-Demand webinar series by We have created a dedicated space on figshare to host Stage 1 protocols accepted in principle at Scientific Reports and offer to upload the protocol on the authors' behalf and keep under embargo Scientific Reports. Snapp is built and developed by a dedicated in-house product team at Springer Nature so that it can remain responsive to user needs. 出版周期：Irregular 自引率：9. 1 Targeted feedback. 1. Just as the reviewer should remember that the author is not necessarily a native English speaker, the author should assume the same of the reviewer when reading a report. The journal editor has possibly identified and sent out invitations to 25 potential reviewers for your paper and is waiting for their response. Journals Journals list Browse more than 70 science journal titles; Subject collections Read the very best research published in IOP journals; Publishing partners Partner organisations and publications; Open access IOP Publishing open access policy guide; IOP Conference Series Read open access proceedings from science conferences worldwide scientific peer review are described, and a model for how to structure a peer review report is provided. Summary: This study aimed to investigate X chromosome dosage compensation for growth rate (GR), Kleiber ratio (KR), efficiency of growth (EF), and relative growth rate (RGR) in Zandi sheep. Stage 1 manuscripts will include only a Background, Methods (including proposed analyses), and Pilot Data (where applicable). You've completed your research, now it’s time to get it published. The video guide Reviewer report ratings Our editors rate the reviewer reports we receive on a scale of 1 to 5. 1 Two examples of open review processes Example 1: Nestel, D. At Stage 1, reviewers assess study proposals before data are collected. Chapter 1 Introduction to Accounting ACCOUNTING – process of identifying, recording, and communicating economic information that is useful in making However, after reviewers completed their assignments, the authors do respond to queries raised by such reviewers, it could be once or a series of reviewer-author responses. Two methods of accounting for Scientific Reports' editorial, publishing and peer review policies help us maintain the highest standards for which we are known and respected. One ref agreed and the other said they were unavailable. Peer review is at the heart of the research process. ) Already submitting a revised version taking into account what the first referees said. However, the paper ist still in the "Initial technical check" phase. , et al. If you would like to obtain a report of your reviewing activity, follow these steps: Log into the journal’s manuscript this document contains a brief reviewer material for FAR subject takers the adjusting entries process before the preparation of financial statements assigns Lecture notes financial accounting and reporting 1-10. I experienced this with several respectable At stage 1, reviewers are asked to assess study proposals before data are collected. Our resources are built for you, whether you’re an early career researcher interested in beginning the review process, or an experienced peer reviewer. So, you could Thus your strategy is similar to the one you would adopt when you receive a referee’s report from a journal: the referee is merely an obstacle to getting your paper accepted, so learn from him / her, and do whatever you can to say something positive about their suggestions, and then implement them into your manuscript. 投稿Springer Nature，Reviewer reports received / Ready for editor’s decision 一直持续20多天是什么意思 努力上岸的投稿人 一审，一直都是这个状态，期间发邮件询问，说是编辑正在做决定 也在当天就变成了“submission under peer review”。中途出现过一次“1 reviewer received”，后面就一直是“submission under peer review”（连一个审稿人接收的提示也不见了），没有过新的变化，到现在都三个月了😭。 请问这是送外审了吗？ In my decision letter, the reviewers have called my work novel. , Brooks, P. I sent an email to the editor this March to inquire about the latest status, but can I again contact the editor? Scientific Reportsに修正論文を提出してからしばらくしてステータスが 3 Reviewer(s) acceptedになりました．このステータスはどういった状態を指しますか？ First submitted to Scientific Reports On 16 Jun, 2022 workday 2022-09-22 5. 1 reports. « Papers » 3. 4. Journals the re-submitted reviewer report will receive a maximum rating of 2. Please use this section of the reviewer report form to record any confidential comments intended for the editor only. A REVIEWER REPORT APEX/JJAP Editorial Board 1 Peer review process then make a publication decision on the basis of reviewers’ reports. What is the format of the reviewer report? A. On January 30, I submitted my article to Scientific Reports to be considered in a special collection. The editorial system shows eleven reviewers invited but only one has accepted. Authors receive peer review reports with the editorial decision on their manuscript. Reviewer report(s) Findings: From 35 included papers, the four main themes that related to written feedback on research reports by novice researchers were: the emotional impact of receiving or giving written Note that, as the reviewer, you will have access to other reviewers' reports via the online submission system after you have submitted your report. 15 Scientific Reports - Receipt of Manuscript 'Detection Tools for' 1 message. Introducing Health Science Reports. 9 / 5. This study aims to Bachelor of Science in Accountancy (BSA) 999+ Documents. (61-63 versus 96-97) Is it 1 to 10 of 1-5? If they are different, why were different scales used. 8 (2023), and is the 5th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 734,000 citations in 2023*. You can also provide details of alternative reviewers. In relation to scientific rigour, the candidate has failed to justify the use of (only) three cases studies. Our editors are now making a decision on your manuscript. On top of that, Scientific Reports does not give editors' contact info. Since then, it is updated every month at this time, but the status has not changed. Societies. 1 What to expect in your decision letter. hope this helps. Once you have completed the Peer Review Excellence course and received a review invitation, Our editors rate all of the reviewer reports we receive on a scale of 1–5, with 5 representing a review of outstanding quality. More information is available here. 2 What to do when you receive your reviewer comments; 20. Journals Journals list Browse more than 70 science journal titles; Subject collections Read the very best research published in IOP journals; Publishing All reviewer reports received. Show reviews 172 Review this journal Editor login. You haven’t also mentioned whether it was a major revision or a minor revision. If reviewers need to delegate the review to a colleague, they should inform the Editorial Office. We value the work of our reviewers and want them to have the recognition they deserve. Certification Peer Review Excellence Rating Summary Detailed description Use in decision making 5 Outstanding— exceptionally detailed and adds valuable insight when informing decision A Registered Report is a peer-reviewed empirical publication where peer-review happens before the results of the study are known. Scientific Reports in Life Sciences (SRLS), (ISSN: 2718-1014), is a globally recognized, double-blind review, multidisciplinary, quarterly periodical. Is this normal? As I understand, it has not even be sent yet to the referees. 我在1月底投稿BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making，之后按编辑要求修改形式，2. Not all of our journals are using the system yet but any general guidance applies to all journals. 1975) Read more. Manuscript got reviewed by 2-2 reviewers, One reviewer gave critical review which was well defended by the authors, but the I submitted to Scientific Reports, but the status has remained ‘Editor Invited’ for three weeks. Automation at the stage of assigning the reviewer to the manuscript is already a reality [], as are solutions which evaluate the probability of studies bias such as RobotReviewer []. 1999;36:234-5. If appropriate, indicate what additional data and information are needed to validate I am a Ph. The current status is ‘Ready for Editor’s Decision/Reports Received,’ and this has been unchanged since May 2020. 1002/hsr2. As of 22 February 2023 these include cognitive neuroscience and Our editors rate all of the reviewer reports we receive on a scale of 1–5, with 5 representing a review of outstanding quality. Students shared 7814 documents in this course ACCO 20053 – FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING &amp; REPORTING. 3 / 5. Box 43. It will guide you through the stages from the moment your article has been submitted until a Alternatively, the editor (1) might have received the minimum number of required reviews but is waiting additional reports from reviewers who have agreed to review the paper but haven’t submitted it yet, or (2) (s)he Editors will consider the peer-reviewed reports when making a decision, but are not bound by the opinions or recommendations therein. IOP Science. Scientific Reports收到1个审稿意见 Download scientific diagram | Screenshot of example published peer review report on F1000Research [22] from publication: Guidelines for open peer review implementation | Open peer review (OPR) is We created Snapp to be intuitive and simple to use, and it’s designed to better meet the needs of the research community - our authors, editors, and reviewers. Your review will consist of two parts: one that will be sent to the 小太阳啊 2021-05-09 I am too, I started looking for 8 people, but only 1 person came back. Reviewer Identities reviewer opt in. No further changes were asked. It is not uncommon to receive a decision based on a single reviewer report. Conclusions: Peer review is a critically important service for maintaining The Registered Reports format encourages the publication of negative results. July 2021 reviewers list of Scientific Reports Journal. ac. The journal was You haven’t mentioned how many reviewers accepted the peer review the first time. 3 Responding to reviewers’ comments with a rebuttal. Also, it is not required to add this much of literature survey for DOTAP, but make it more concise. Read 25 answers by scientists with 2 recommendations from their colleagues to the question asked by Chan Kin Onn on Apr 18, 2022 I have received the reviewer recognition certificate for reviewing the article entitled “Determination and dietary intake risk assessment of 35 pesticide residues in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L Some indexed journals accept accept scientific reports nature once rigorously peer-reviewed research from across the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. 58–9. A concern raised by a single peer reviewer or the Editor themself may result in the manuscript being rejected. Note that Scientific Reports is pretty much an "accept everything" journal; they filter out some junk but they do As the grantee of a Horizon 2020 (H2020) or Horizon Europe (HE) ERC-funded project, you are required to submit scientific and financial reports as set out in your Grant Agreement (see Article 20 H2020 or Article 21 HE). In the first step, the best model was selected, and in the second step, additional models with X chromosome effects were fitted and compared. Any reviewer who submits a reviewer report rated 5 will achieve IOP Trusted Reviewer status and become eligible for our Outstanding Reviewer Awards. 66 (range [4. Today, it was updated to ‘Quality Manuscripts reporting studies involving human participants, human data or human tissue must: The world of science. Quality of review reports. 12 The majority of reviewers report that they have never received formal peer review training, 13 and instead have mostly obtained that Instructions for Reviewers of Reports should be published in Science and provide a more detailed critique based on the following: Technical Rigor: Evaluate whether, or to what extent, the data and methods substantiate the conclusions and interpretations. The paper is original, it reads well and is of importance to clinicians, patients, teachers and policymakers. Reviewer Comments: Reviewer 1. 1% 审稿周期： 开通期刊会员，数据随心看 Perhaps the editorial board is reviewing the decision and the manuscript, and a technical editor needs to check the manuscript and the reviewer comments to ensure that journal standards have been followed. Author/reviewer communication. Since then the status did not change. I submitted a manuscript to Scientific Reports in December 2019. Assessing reviewer reports. To answer you question about how it's perceived, in my experience, people view it similarly to PLOS one. 丁香园论坛 论文写作投稿 帖子详情. Recent works have addressed the need for research to apply Artificial Intelligence in the various phases of the peer review process. *2023 Journal Citation Reports® Science study proposals before data are collected. Please note that reports are not The descriptive analysis of quantitative outcomes in the sample of journals revealed a median number of figure or tables per article of 6. g. Improve this question. • They must be highly readable — that is, clear, accurate, and concise. Course. The essential feature of a registered report is that research proposals are evaluated by reviewers before collection of data takes place. 2 Take a rejection seriously; 20. Most of your reviewer report should go in this section. Congratulations on your first paper! You should definitely be proud and do something to celebrate, it's a great achievement. 3 Time taken to receive your decision; 20. On June 4, it still showed that one expert's opinion was received, so we sent a reminder again, and they replied that they were waiting for the opinion of the second reviewer. Making a decision. 3. Get recognition for your effort. What's new? Snapp - Editing a journal. Now, 2 months later, I'm expecting to have 6 referee reports (5/6 agreed). Snapp is built in-house by Springer Nature, so it continuously evolves to respond to researcher needs. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again We provide official reports of reviewing activity for all of our reviewers. student and presently dealing with my first paper that I had submitted to Scientific Reports. If you decline, you can tell us why you're not able to accept this time. id. Reviewer reports are also published in some open approaches. 3. I submitted the revised manuscript. A Registered Report is a form of empirical article offered at Nature for papers in selected areas. The manuscript details are contained in the invitation email. I submitted the BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making at the end of Jan, and then modified the form as required by the editor. 60 - day note Scientific Reports. I had submitted a manuscript in an IOP journal a month back. math, modelling, I found it really hard to get reviewers for our papers. , Bearman, M. In the introduction, before doing the literature survey of DOTAP, introduce what DOTAP is in one to two lines. Comments to the editor/s. See Box 43. To help the journal editor(s) decide whether a paper: a. Reviewers will have access to other reviewers' reports through the online submission system after submitting their own report. However, finding the right profile and numbers of peer reviewers is always challenging, even for a Nature journal. I have never had this number of reports, including Nature or Science. When preparing your written report you should remember the two roles of a reviewer: (1) Make a recommendation to the handling editor. Then click on items in the « Reviews » column of the papers list to access the Editor/Reviewer reports of your paper. We have, however, seen take up of this service decline across Springer Nature journals and we are exploring other options and ways Unearned Revenues (Deferred Revenues) – revenues collected or received in advance; or revenues already collected in cash but not yet earned or only a portion of the amount received was earned. This may mean providing feedback to reviewers who provide unhelpful reviews. Reviewer The definition of journal acceptance rate is the percentage of all articles submitted to Scientific Reports that was accepted for publication. Asking to use the two received referee reports to come to a decision due to some external pressure to publish rapidly (thesis defense, project reports etc. Stage 1 manuscripts will include only an Introduction, Methods (including proposed analyses), and Pilot Data (where applicable). Despite this attention, there is a notable scarcity of empirical investigations into the tangible impact of peer review on publication quality. 40 days later, not yet receiving an update on the status, I wrote to the journal. Most of the results seem obvious. Pre-refereeing stage Upon receiving a new manuscript, the editorial office conducts initial pre-refereeing checks to ensure the article is legible, complete, correctly formatted, original, within the scope of the journal in question, in the style of a scientific article, and written in clear English. July 2021; Scientific Reports; Authors: Elhassan Benyagoub. Venkatesan Department Despite the critical importance of peer review, there is surprisingly little education in the course of scientific or clinical training that is focused on how to perform peer review of a scientific manuscript. Stage 1 Stage 1 manuscripts will include only an Introduction, Methods (including proposed analyses), and When preparing your written report you should remember the two roles of a reviewer: (1) Make a recommendation to the handling editor. This is still round 1. The type of peer review used by a journal should be clearly stated in the invitation to review letter you receive and policy pages on the journal website. the math is trivial, no new concept in comp Scientific Reports is an online, We, therefore, ask reviewers to provide a report promptly; ideally within 10 days of receiving a manuscript, but this may be extended by prior arrangement. D. Any reviewer who submits a reviewer report rated 5 will Reviewers will assess the technical soundness and scientific validity of your methods, analysis and interpretation, all of which must be appropriate, properly conducted, ethically robust and Springer's tracking system showed "Reviewer reports received / Ready for editor’s decision" after a major revision on December 26th. vdiy gnrkg vfdn uhwpa eozwdl noqfrsoq vqrgo fvvni bqxx cjcocd