Hd600 bass eq. which could easily be fixed with an EQ.

Hd600 bass eq If you want overwhelming bass that engulfs an entire mix and pretty much sux at every other frequency but the lower end - beats pro's work. If a headphone sounds bad out of the box i do not want phoney frequencies to try make a headphone sound better. You can EQ it. Sennheiser and AKG are among As far as the HD650's, I can get really good bass both from kick drums and bass guitar/synth bass with EQ. g. These I felt basically solved both of the issues I had with either the HD600 or the K702. The HE4XX has better soundstage than the HD600 whilst also having significantly clearer and deeper bass (once EQ'd). I use a low shelf EQ on NeutronMusicPlayer to trim the bass and lower midrange response and bring it closer to the rest of the range (-2dB, 850hz, 1. I tried the flat profile. I have had around the same bass EQ on all of them (10db boost at 20hz down to 2db at 80z). Joined Apr 26, 2004 Posts If you liked the deeper bass extension and extra bass emphasis of the Sony WH-000XM3, you may be disappointed in the HD600. The AD700s lack bass but I found having an amp with a eq bass boost was not that dramatic then going to the x2HR. EQ (as long as you're being reasonable) can improve sound a bit. I have HD600 and DT1990, using the DT1990 for listening to well mastered music that delivers That and a little bit of EQ for certain genres. And I EQ'd the treble peaks too, at 4420 and 5600. My so called "audiophile" Senn HD6xx/650 cans are far from it. Amp connected to your source directly, or through an Apple or Samsung USB-C to 3. They lack bass which is why i am doing this. In a way, I wanted to make a “supercharged” HD 660S out of the Clear as I already found it somewhat similar to the HD 600-series tonality, but with superior technical performance. However, in our opinion, a little more work is needed, so we add an additional EQ after Sonarworks. I did my test on several songs and can’t say Sub-bass is non existent, it is there but barely. But if I need to EQ to make them sound good (to me) I suppose I should get a different set of headphones like you say. My current bass custom eq is 32Hz +4db 64Hz +3db The rest I don't touch. Mostly for movies and they suck. I use them with the Goodhertz CanOpener3 and a corrective EQ curve. You can EQ more bass on the 600 than the 660s. If you close your eyes and focus on each instrument the sub bass is what comes out Sennheiser HD 600's are my favouritest headphones ever. Found it overbearing for FFVIX (sharp menu sounds) and just in general with some specific songs. Timbre and natural sound, which are pretty much two ways of saying the same thing, are the only things the HD600 have over the HD800S. The lower the bass frequency, the more effort the speakers require. com. For this reason I returned hd560s and hd660s(. e. My K701 did that very noticeably when I tried to EQ it once. I can say for a long time that I like the headphones and the bass is sufficient)) But there are companies that don't like bass. So basically I adjusted the settings according to what I have in the second picture, and I based off my first adjustments based on the difference between the output of the hd600 before eq and the Harman target. In support of what you say re bass distortion, when I eq'd up the bass to Harman levels I found the bass to be not very well defined and a bit loose. I always use EQ. It certainly “sounds” that way, but here I’m thinking of measurements that Jurgen Kraus made for the Custom Cans mod. I also find soundstage and timbre better on the 1990. It is fun. Much quicker and more dynamic which is essential to classical. Now select the bass track and find the Fruity Parametric EQ 2 in the effects rack. com A. These pair will be very engaging as it has an intimate soundstage and neutral EQ-ing can't alter the basic physics inside the headphone, no matter how some folks here may wish it to be so. So if you boost the bass by 10 dB in most Mostly for movies and they suck. In terms of frequency response, you can totally compensate for the bass roll-off with an EQ. and EQ further. please. They differ strongly from ones on rtings. I'm just curious what the "pros" would say. But i think they can PC Setup: SoundblasterX G6 DAC -> JDS Labs Atom Headphone Amp -> Hifiman HE400SE & Senn HD560s & HD800 & AKG K702 & Hifiman HE4XX & NAD HP50 & Senn HD600 all EQ'd to Harman Curve. But the big surprise was the AKG K701 I never had been completely happy with. They are by default +1db in the Dolby atmos app for some reason. github. May 21, 2022 #4 Based on some of the Most open-back that are often recommended here have neutral sound profile and won't have boosted bass. Like none at all even. So now you can see what the driver is doing when you're listening to a bassy song. I think the balance in the vocal range is perfect. The 650 has slightly better bass extension and a warmer (but less neutral) sound, but that's out of the box, before EQ. 0 dB? Check the settings of Peace EQ - you can manually set the increment of the sliders. 5 db less bass. This EQ further enhances the sub Hello! Looking to make my first audiophile-grade headphone purchase. The k612 reacts I think the fit on HD600 is perfect when they fit your head. I prefer the HD650 over the R70x with and without EQ. It's quite surprising when removing EQ how the 660S actually sounds like. The HD600 isnt known for an excessive amount of bass and it actually shys compared to its competition save for the k701 (i. It is present and to my ears what makes the bass of the HD 600 so special is the very small hint of colored sub bass. Reply reply I was hoping someone could help me find Sennheiser HD6xx EQ HD800's respond well to EQ. I even went to get the old AKG K240DF (600 If they get loud enough and the bass doesn't sound strange or very soft (HD600 has a bit soft bass to begin with) then it's likely fine. Every headphone is meaningfully improved with EQ (K 371 might be the exception). It's like bass coming from electrostatics or 2 way speakers that have superb bass extension vs bass coming from a big 3way or big speaker with a woofer that goes just as low. Overall Bass Quantity/Perception: HD650 > HD600 FTW! Explains why when I owned both the HD600 and HD650 for awhile the HD600 just sounded punchier and cleaner in the bass (most noticeable for me on electronic music). com measurements are more correct. Check out my: - HD600 Bass recovery EQ Correction s / - Easy UES EQ Correction Oratory1990's new HD600 EQ works really well in Equalizer APO as a baseline, and tested a few other settings that i found elsewhere and collated them here with a HS that works for me, but there was still the snare and hi hat attack issue, which i added a few bits to for the 'treble fix': Code: Preamp: -9. I’ve got the hd600’s and have some hd6xx’s and hd58x’s coming (headphone overdose, maybe), I bought the hd58x’s before I realised I’d probably prefer the sound signature of the hd6xx’s, but who knows, maybe I’ll prefer them for the bass the hd600’s were lacking. No harsh sound, no sibilances, just maybe a little too much Hd600 + EQ for The rap hip hop as you'll want to probably do a bass boost. HD660S. Sundara will have the same issue with bass. Check out my: - HD600 Bass recovery EQ Correction s / - Easy UES EQ Correction Honestly I can't give you a number, but you'll know you're coming up to a limit of what the bass can do when you start increasing the sub bass but you start hearing the mid bass get affected. Conclusion: Are the Sennheiser HD 600 worth it in 2022? The Sennheiser HD 600 proves that newer is not necessarily better. The video quality is not especially great - it was just on my phone, sorry about that. I’m not amused that the HD600 is telling me I have an asymmetrical head. Use a bass mod AKG Q701 now. Honestly, seeing measurements of where it rolls off in the bass, it actually doesn't roll off much sooner than Sundara 2020. It is just that it sounds less than it does due to other aspects of the sound. If you looking for good quality sub bass and open headphones, I'd recommend checking DT1990. Crinacle has these headphones ranked next to each other. I need more time to be sure, but so far I could sum them up as follows : (1) they improve things slightly (both the HD600 and the Sundara are fairly neutral without EQ), especially for the HD600 (better bass extension), and (2) there may still be a little too much treble for my taste. I use a zen dac with the true bass, and I prefer a warmer tone. How high can i go on the 25 hz? My current one While HD58x seems really fun to listen, HD600 adds a lot of emotions to music, what isn't so obvious on HD58x due to little reccesed 3-5Khz (really only about 2dB). If you are desperate to lower the bass on your HD6x0 without EQ, adding circles of felt to the mm or so of room behind the stock foam seems to achieve this without changing anything much above 500Hz. Sundara was my previous mid-fi benchmark for detail, imaging, and separation. The HD660s on the other hand are more wider sounding, great soundstage, very good imaging. If you want to listen to Harman like this then I suggest trying HD660s/s2 someday, because they sound even better than HD600 after EQ. The HD600 seemed to respond better to EQ down low as well. 660s2 for the price of HD600 is a good choice, a better one IMO. But some people have different preferences, and prefer either a more neutral response curve, or perhaps a bit more bass. So does negative preamp gain on peace eq have a detrimental effect on an amp’s power? I run my Arya’s through a jotunheim 2 with 6 watts running balanced, and have a pretty ridiculous preamp of -48 on peace eq because of the amount of volume I get from the amp. The Magni fits very very well to the Sennheiser HD600. If you want good deep bass extension down to 20hz, then you might want to look into the Sennheiser HD560S that was recently released. Reply reply More replies. You can get HD6XX’s for ~$200 or you can get an HD600 from Blinq for $229 when they have the open box deals. The soundstage is wider than the HD600, though nowhere near as wide as the K702, which I have learned I actually prefer. Q2. It kinda follows what you and others are saying about it, especially when comparing it. They shouldn't. I disagree with the lacking part. Just how well does this headphone from the 1990s hold up in 2023?Read more headpho Resolve digs into the Sennheiser HD I listen to my studio teacher's HD600 with a bass boosting preset all the time. 1 dB and you’re good to go. If you want an EQ preset or software you can always ask for it here. 5 kHz, maybe a little boost in the air band above 8kHz, that's it. 3 Reply by timiambeing 2020-08-06 23:04:53. If these EQ even okay then I'd take these over the HD800s since I don't like the soundstage and bass on them. I'm kinda strapped for cash but I can make do with a dt990 EQ'd for the tracks I listened to. Both of them much better options The DT 990 PRO or the DT 900 PRO X will be right up your alley, especially considering they preserve more sub-bass than the Sennheiser HD 600. If I own the HD 6xx and the (ancient) HD 560 Ovation-II which, like the HD 600, are somewhat high-impedance headphones. 😩 Anyway, time to flip the headband cushion pad. they all provided plenty of bass from the hd600. And I don’t really like fiddling with EQ. Versus the FiiO FT5 and FT3 I have an upcoming review of the However, for scenes that actually require bass, the HD600 just falls flat on its face. Don’t worry about downloading anything just copy the settings over to the EQ. But after using the 58x for abit more and going back to xm3, i realised that my ears have adjusted to the 58x and i tend to find the xm3's bass Does anyone EQ the sub-bass of the HD600? In the past I didn't know what sub-bass even was so I assumed my HD600s were super dull. Only problem really is the lack of soundstage and subbass. When my ears adapts to the HD565, even HD650’s bass is sometimes too much for me. Even if you add sub-bass with an equalizer, it can sound muddy and even distorted; sennheiser speakers do not tolerate adding bass with an equalizer and high volume. IEM: X Crinacle Zero. com measurements and listening which I feel neutralizes HD600 a lot without adding Harman response bass boost: 1: high shelf 40Hz -5dB Q=0. No Sennheiser hd600 would ever sound even with EQ as good as my AKG. Noticeable difference, but it won't give your HD600 Bose-level bass. But always with EQ. That’s the great thing about neutral audio signature. The amount even depends on how loud you listen with it. Classical/audiophile recordings seem a whole lot more transparent and correct on the 600 to me. I've had my HD600 set for a couple of years. You can just adjust it quite easily. 5 or 5. I did not like the sound of the Both the HD600 and HD650 are high-impedance headphones designed for audiophile-grade listening with an open-back design that contributes to their spacious soundstage. Reply. I feel that it is more present over the anemic 560S’ bass response, and it is faster and quicker. To my ears, the imaging has strong left/right/center with a more vague off-center image, but I've used it for gaming and it's not the worst. If you use EQ a pair of Beyerdynamic DT1990 pro I find way better for classical. I'm just not a big fan of the HD600 lineup as much as I wanted to be, and they're good headphones dont get me wrong, but they're just not for me personally. Open both, go to the EQ 2, right-click the first band, and select “Link to controller. So, there will be a big drop off in the lower bass without EQ and extra "juice" for both headphones. If you want the same full mids and vocals on HD600, there are not many headphones that can compare with Sennheiser HD6x0 series. Alchemistt 100+ Head-Fier. EQ has the most potential on Windows and Android. Good luck tinkering with EQ, hopefully you won't have to purchase another pair to satisfy your needs. The 650 does not match the 600 resolution, when you eq it to the 600 FR. 4 Reply by KaiS 2020-08-07 09:44:38 (edited by KaiS 2020 I use Peace EQ and I can not set a filter to e. Headphone Amps (full-size) Thread starter GoldenSausage; Start date Mar 13, 2015; Mar 13, 2015 at 1:00 AM Thread Starter Post #1 of 15 GoldenSausage New Head-Fier. I like the sound best with no pads and bass eq. 5mm dongle, will be fine to start with. Now that I know what it is it still has that problem, but I just EQ'd the sub-bass and now I get more life out of them. I use EQ to bump the bass a bit, but the HD 600's distortion levels rise very quickly under ~200Hz with a distortion peak at ~40Hz (squarely in the sub-bass region), so I'm conservative with the amount and use a slow-rising low-shelf filter set at 80Hz. I guess it would be acceptable with the sonata but probably less so with an ipod. Still (all lossless) Desktop: Focusrite Clarett 4Pre-> Sennheiser HD600 (DIY balanced) / HHB Circle 5 Studio monitors + Circle 1 sub Portable: Pono player-> DIY balanced Koss KSC-75 / balanced Senn HD600 Mee Audio M6 Pro (2nd gen) / Easy UES with custom EQ correction. It goes away if I turn the EQ off. The Sundara definitely needs an AMP/DAC to be driven properly, especially with EQ to "fix" the sub-bass roll-off. The app only works with Harman OE so it's not perfect for this job but the form is very convenient. but i want a 31 band EQ. Soundstage. With EQ, the bass can be elevated quite a lot without Personally, I don't think the HD650 are worth that much more, and I daily drive HD650. I kid you not, I had been using HD800's for 3 years and just this year I tried to EQ them and the added bass felt pretty nice to the point that I You can get much better bass out of them at least. If you would like to try out my EQ profile for the Focal Clear, you can input these settings in your equalization software of choice: Low Shelf at 115hz, +3dB Q I have a pair of HD 600, HD 6xx and HD 58x Jubilee. EQ does a lot and some here are saying that you will not like a headphone with EQ if don't like it without, but that's total bs imo. From here, go to the kick mixer channel and find the Fruity Peak Controller in the effects rack. TEAM GRADO: MS2I, BLACK 325, 325I, RS2. I always find myself going back to the HD 600. which could easily be fixed with an EQ. If they're really lacking in bass like a lot, then EQ can't fix it. And I have the Anandas to compliment with them anyway. I haven’t heard one thing about them since I got into the world of headphones. Last edited: Oct 11, 2021 PC Setup : SoundblasterX G6 DAC -> JDS Labs Atom Headphone Amp It is my current opinion of why I didn't like bass EQ on the HD600 though. If you really want a 600 or 650 for a decent price, sell your 58X and save up an extra $50-70. Forums. IEM: X Crinacle Zero. Good headphones but not on Resolve digs into the Sennheiser HD 600: Design, comfort, and performance. The HD600 is rather easy to drive with 300 Ohms. Hey Marcel! I had no idea the HD 360 existed. But with his eq I would say the hd600 is more accurate sounding if not perfect. The differences to the 990 are bigger. Bass: As mentioned the XS’s have a noticeable bass swing. I have Hd650 and HD565(less bass then HD600, much better stereo image). My HD 6XX don't lack bass for me either, but sometimes, when I really need more, I simply EQ it in. Just be aware that while the sub-bass takes a lot of area up on a chart, it doesn’t actually represent a ton of what you hear in movies or music, so it’s not actually a huge point in favor of the Beyerdynamics, just a minor It seems to have a wider soundstage and a bit more brightness. I will definitely have to do some I'd say detail retrieval is on HD600 level, but it's "center-image" is a bit weak, just like with most planar magnetic driver headphones. HD560s: Seems like it could improve on the bass from HD600 and it is easier to drive. Both the Sennheiser HD 660S2 and the Sennheiser HD600 are audiophile open-back headphones designed for analytical listening, though the HD 660S2 are better for this purpose. 4). the 650 and 880). The difference between the HD600 and HD650 is small. I have Sennheiser HD600. ☺️ Without EQ, the amount of bass is leaning more towards being bass-light, which isn't optimal for bass-heavy genres like modern hip-hop and various electronic subgenres. Honestly, most people I have talked to (including myself) prefer the HD600. The bass is pretty punchy, the mids retain most of their intimacy from the HD600, and there is sparkle in the treble. Joined Mar 2, 2011 Posts 35 Likes 0. The mid bass is not colored. TV/"Home theatre" Setup: Sony Bravia KDL42w653a (calibrated with Spyder4Pro and HCFR) -> miniDSP 2x4 -> JBL 308P Mkii With regard to EQ vs other means of boosting bass, I just wanted to clarify that there is some evidence that mechanical alterations sometimes get different distortion responses than EQ at the same SPL. I boosted the bass freqs on the Sonys to match more like the Sennhaiser's sound, and voila - I had a nice really nice balance of highs and lows. QC is better and warranty is better. Share Feb 26, 2024 at 8:14 PM. The HD600’s bass in comparison resembles more of a bass head sound, but that’s only with the 9500 as a buffer. They tend to start rolling off a lot in bass output below 100hz. I love them. I thought it looked cool and might be something some of you would like to see. 3 dB Filter: ON PK Fc 20 Hz Gain 4 dB Q 1. Some The Sennheiser HD 600 headphones already have a nice sound even without EQ correction, but to get the most out of them, especially when using them for music production, we recommend calibrating them for a flat frequency response. The HD 600 will bring out all the nuances and details, but it won’t necessarily sound very fun. can you provide or upload that target. The HD600 doesn't have any annoying treble peaks, but its bass is comparatively less clear and at the same time more rolled off. Sennheiser is comfortable. As of last night, re-enabled Peace / Equalizer APO and used a modified version of oratory1990's EQ settings (The Harman Kardon curve tends to be too dark for my taste). (The CC mod is a ring inserted on the I tried the Oratory EQ, and it's quite a change of sound, more treble, more bass. The HD 600 just about excel at every genre except for anything with prominent bass. AutoEq/results at master · jaakkopasanen/AutoEq Automatic headphone equalization from frequency responses - jaakkopasanen/AutoEq. I am trying to figure out the best bass boost setting for clear and high quality bass. Now it sounds hollow. If I boost bass on the Fiio, I don't have that effect. Not much you can do here. I checked some threads and checked rtings comparisons, but wanted to get some more insights. KaiS's Website. You do not tighten the bass of the HD650 when you lower the bass amplitude, you are merely lowering bass volume so that it is harder to hear the bass flaws. The HD 650’s boosted bass presence and treble roll-off get in the way of what these headphones do so remarkably well: deliver truly natural-sounding reproduction. The HD600's rolloff is gentle and starts at a low As for the EQ, I dont think the HD600 really needs much to be relatively neutral (the highs could do with a boost if anything) and then the bass moved up. I like this. You can't really "fix" the bass level with EQ because it just increases distortion and reduces clarity. The pro-audio Sonarworks plugin (for VST/RTAS/AAX formats, 21 day trial available) has HD600 correction, and sure enough it corrects for some of the bass rolloff - but Here's a more appropriate EQ setting for the HD600: Bass: +3 dB Mids: 0 dB Treble: +1 dB This will help to add a bit more warmth and depth to the sound without overpowering the mids. the 600s' flaws should be handled carefully. Hey Stu, God bless you man and thanks for this write up. A $50 dongle like an iBasso DC50 would certsinly be enough. Interesting that your profiles show using high cpu usage in Equalizer APO Editor. It adds some apparent bass boost, which is quite natural for most of crossfeed effects, as it essentially mixes lowpassed and delayed signal from opposite channel. 650 has pleasing vocals, but then they are always pleasant, never any bite. Desktop: Focusrite Clarett 4Pre-> Sennheiser HD600 (DIY balanced) / HHB Circle 5 Studio monitors + Circle 1 sub Portable: Pono player-> DIY balanced Koss KSC-75 / balanced Senn HD600 Mee Audio M6 Pro (2nd gen) / Easy UES with custom EQ correction. Crystal clear (akin to electrostats) but lacking in dynamics. Bass. My preference would be: HD 600 (w/ EQ) > HD I sometimes feel like the <100hz bass frequencies are too quiet, but I am very bad at EQing it the way I want. They do have some similar characteristics in the bass, but listening to them side-by-side it is very clear that the HD 650 has significantly more presence in the lows, whilst the HD 600 delivers a flatter bass response. But the bass response, while average to start, suffers in accuracy when I add EQ, and the soundstage is fairly One such feature is the earcup vibration in the bass, which often causes the autoEQ script to warp the response. Maybe it's what I like I will start where some people feel the HD 600 is lacking and that is in the bass. Distortion is proportional with SPL. You’ll notice more thump and less of a needle-like precision. It will give you more headroom to EQ more aggressively though. Not surprisingly both headphones (like many other dynamics) have some pretty awful THD in the The bass quality of the HD600 should be similar to the 6XX/HD650 save that the HD650 has a bulge in the mid-bass around 170hz. HD800s sounds immediately more impressive, but not for the bass. You . I love my hd58x and want more detail/clarity with a similar signature. I recommend also turning the output of the EQ down 7-8 dB if you have a lot of VERY low cycle signal. But in the long run, I prefer without EQ, somehow it's less fatiguing for me. A little more bass over the HD600 but really you are not buying these headphones for bass. Probably doesn't need a lot of EQ. One of the most My EQ settings in iTunes do bring out the bass a bit more, and in some regards, I do prefer the more lean response. So far I’ve had HD600, grado sr60 and m50x, didn’t EQ neither of those, I like different sounding headphones. When I use the Rock equalizer setting in Poweramp, it seems like the bass is boosted too much, resulting in a slight crackle or clipping sound. I would prefer that as I have less cash right now and would prefer to keep my equipment and wait for the future where I could potentially afford the Audeze LCD-2 Classics instead. They came to life a lot, now actually having decent bass. It gives a lot more of a depth to the songs and does not However, since I'm already using an EQ on my HD 600 to boost the sub-bass and slightly lower the upper-mids and lower-treble, I don't see any reason to use the HD 660S2. They have better bass and highs. The HD650 are darker and does have a tiny bit more bass but if you find the HD600 to be really lacking in bass then the HD650 aren't going to fix that 100% and you'd fair better just looking elsewhere entirely. Have not proven themselves as HD600 Closest thing is an IEM that can be EQ-d easily to mimic the HD600. 5 dB, set it to 0. I'm using a Nexus 5 -- PowerAmp -- USB -- Fiio E17 -- Vsonic GR07 Bass Edition. If you're on a Mac then I can see some advantages of HD600. I prefer your other two profiles. Sadly tubes don't give me as much bass as I expected. Ideally you'd want max usable volume at about 80% output and if you want to EQ to improve the bass and balance then that'll require about twice the outout power compared to no Bass Impact: HD650 > HD800 > HD600 = HD545 I wouldn’t call any of these bass head headphones. I'd generally recommend an AMP/DAC Stack or a combo device for headphones in this price range I like the HD600. It has enough mid-bass to not be boomy or anemic. After EQ they're both virtually indistinguishable. Hd600 + EQ for The rap hip hop as you'll want to probably do a bass boost. The audeze is in a completely different price point tho Band 1 PEAK 30 Hz 2,0 dB 1,6 0,89 Adjust gain of band 7 to preference ("Bass") Band 2 PEAK 125 Hz -3,5 dB 0,4 3,02 Deviation from Target Adjust gain of band 8 to preference (airiness) Band 3 PEAK 1300 Hz -1,9 dB 1,5 0,94 Before EQ After EQ Band 4 PEAK 3200 Hz -2,5 dB 2,5 0,57 1,71 dB 0,39 dB Adjust gain of band 1 to preference (subbass extension) Band 5 PEAK 5800 since i use my 600 thru winamp(Mad) most of the time and i know that these senns are'nt perfect, for the past few days i tried to find the best EQ setting thru the winamp EQ. Both the HD 600 and HD 650 see a bump in the mid-bass at around 150hz, and while I do not think that it is that noticeable on Desktop: Focusrite Clarett 4Pre-> Sennheiser HD600 (DIY balanced) / HHB Circle 5 Studio monitors + Circle 1 sub Portable: Pono player-> DIY balanced Koss KSC-75 / balanced Senn HD600 Mee Audio M6 Pro (2nd gen) / Easy UES with custom EQ correction. 1 Filter: ON PK I'd just use an EQ to boost the bass, buying an amp with bass boost does the same exact thing (but costs money) A possible idea would be selling your 600s, and then using that money and the money you saved from not buying an amp and buy bassier headphones If it’s boosting the bass to the point of distortion, it doesn’t matter if it’s with EQ or otherwise. They’re all pretty close to be honest, but give the HD800 some EQ and it can hit harder than all of them. Obviously I flipped between Harman Curve EQ's and the EQ's you see pictured above and I prefer the Harman EQ's, so mimicking the HD600 (with +3dB bass boost) in my other headphones was not a success, it didn't sound horrible, but it didn't suit those headphones as well as it does the HD600 for some reason, and it didn't enhance the spatial properties Now that I have all my aftermarket pieces for the BH Crack, I'll find out if the EQ I have set now works. However, you need an EQ which is controllable (parametric), because every headphone's rolloff is different—you can't apply the same bass boost to every headphone and expect it to work perfectly. . Sometimes it's too loud and sometimes it's too quiet. Here are a couple of tracks that I think sound really good through the HD600 if you wanna give them a try: The Chain - Fleetwood Mac Melancholy Blues - Queen United States of Eurasia - Muse You could try running the HD600 with a balanced cable through the balanced output on your BTR5 which will give them more power and possibly improve bass. but I did read somewhere recently how the HD600 lends itself to EQ adjustments better than most so I thought it might be worth a shot . These setting EQ the HD600 towards the newest Harman curve (which is a target curve based on the settings that most people prefer). You will need an amp anyway for the HD600, I’d go that way and find an amp with the bass boost if that is a concern. To me they sound a little bit warmer which i don't know if that's the sound i should get. csch1992 • Loving my 660s 2 Reply reply [deleted] • Dunno, hd600 series is probably most Yup, the reason I want to try planars is their faster response and "quicker" bass as a result. ” Desktop: Focusrite Clarett 4Pre-> Sennheiser HD600 (DIY balanced) / HHB Circle 5 Studio monitors + Circle 1 sub Portable: Pono player-> DIY balanced Koss KSC-75 / balanced Senn HD600 Mee Audio M6 Pro (2nd gen) / Easy UES with custom EQ correction. There is still a decent amount of mid-upper bass, which is sufficient to nicely complement instrumental/vocal focused genres like rock, jazz, soul, classical etc. It's an endless Desktop: Focusrite Clarett 4Pre-> Sennheiser HD600 (DIY balanced) / HHB Circle 5 Studio monitors + Circle 1 sub Portable: Pono player-> DIY balanced Koss KSC-75 / balanced Senn HD600 Mee Audio M6 Pro (2nd gen) / Easy UES with custom EQ correction. After adjusting I seem to be getting more bass which is good, but would this be a bad solution to the sub-bass rolloff on the hd600? The HD600’s however have little bass and for punky rock or rap just left me wanting more. Add that on top of the puffy mid/upper bass and lower mids and I'm out. However, I was looking at Crinacle's headphone rankings and he said that the HD 600's had better detail, clarity, and imaging than the HD 650. Check out my: - HD600 Bass recovery EQ Correction s / - Easy UES EQ Correction i think it has plenty and i've used three diff amps, pa2v2, sr71, and mpx3. HD 600 with a good Amp + EQ have enough base for my liking. I'm currently leaning towards the HD 650's because u/oratory1990's EQ of them seems to have much better bass than the HD 600's. Here are the settings for the HD600. I'm familiar with both. I picked the HD600 over the HD650 because I wanted more details in the highs, but I suppose I can't have everything haha. Not night and day difference, but apparent enough for me to only keep the HD600 around. The Sundara feels like it has a more impactful bass due to it’s excellent punch and slam qualities. Even when i upped the quantity, the xm3 has this deeper hit that closed backs can do due to design. I think that is because I have had the HD 600 the longest and have just gotten used to the sound signature. Would you raise it even more? I know I should try out myself and I have. They deliver audio more consistently and have a slightly more bass-heavy sound profile, that conveys the punch and boom in kicks and basslines better. While EQ can help to boost bass volume, it would not drastically change the sound signature without breaking it. Everything I've read about the HD 600 tells me the same. Do not believe in EQ. I've had HD 650 and HD 700, and now Audeze lcd X. I have the ASG-1. These things should last 2 decades with only wear on the pads and headband. Setting the pot too low could introduce channel imbalance. A good amp simply amplifies, It is a start from which you can decide if you like more / less bass etc. I have never had an issue with the HD600’s being shouty but they do have a slightly better defined treble imo, but I believe this is also just a product of their sound signature. Stu February 26, 2016 - 2:21 am. I liked the tonal balance of the 660s. I am so happy with them and they are a great step up from the old ones. It's so good that I can't get along with Sonarworks or similar flat EQ settings because any change to the midrange takes away from it. Post #7 of 29 A. I like articulate, musical, just enough bass, not overwhelming amounts or anything like that, but the HD650 has no bass extension and is somewhat lacking of the appropriate amount of lows. I have a pair You can always use EQ to take the edge off part of the treble in the HD560s and to also increase the bass. For mixing if I use headphones I use HD650 with Toneboosters Morphit plugin (Fixes muddyness and veil), but before I used it sans Morphit and it still translated so good. They're Quick subjective impressions here: HD 600 - sound signature tilted towards bright-neutral. The HD650 is known to offer a slightly warmer It is even so similar, that my EQ preset for the HD 600 works perfectly on the HD 600 and vice versa. The EQ setting otherwise sounds The HD600 is the purple. I'd say don't go above few db's of eq increase, you could also look for some specific EQ settings for I strongly question Oratory1990 measurements. TL;DR HD600 and HD58x are really simmilar headphones (like 95% simmilar). The HD650 are darker and does have a tiny bit more bass but if you find the HD600 to be really lacking in bass then the HD650 aren't going to fix that 100% and you'd fair better just looking elsewhere The HD600 isn't a bass heavy headphone. The body from the bass is missing. (all lossless) Desktop: Focusrite Clarett 4Pre-> Sennheiser HD600 (DIY balanced) / HHB Circle 5 Studio monitors + Circle 1 sub Portable: Pono player-> DIY balanced Koss KSC-75 / balanced Senn HD600 Mee Audio M6 For the times I do use EQ these are my results: Any of the Sennheiser's literally die if you try to give them that bit of sub bass that they're missing. ADU Major Contributor . timiambeing; New member; Offline; Registered: 2020-07-19; Posts: 4; Re: Playing with EQ for my HD600 Did i did this EQ right for the Sennheiser HD600? I can tell the difference and it sounds better i think but i am not sure if i did this right. 🤷‍♂️ With regard to EQ vs other means of boosting bass, I just wanted to clarify that Few dB of bass boost by taste, a bit of broadband reduction of the area around 2. Listening to Pineapple Thief’s Dissolution album sounds satisfying with these headphones because of how tight it sounds. The HD650's handle bass pretty well if you EQ them correctly. Reply reply ConsciousNoise5690 • Sadly tubes don't give me as much bass as I expected. EQ will not address sound stage and sub bass response due to the 600s propensity towards distortion equalizer apo hd600 sub-bass Replies: 2; Forum: Headphones (full-size) Is sub-bass a must in modern pop ahd hip hop tracks (with EDM elements)? I'm looking at acquiring a dt990 pro as a sidegrsfe to my hd600. Check out my: - HD600 Bass recovery EQ Correction s / - Easy UES EQ Correction I personally havent had issues with distortion and I found that HD560s has surprisingly good bass extension. All of their headphones got a pretty large bass roll off. I couldnt increase the bass with EQ on my HD 6XX without mudding everything else a lot. Oratory Sir, In an interview with resolve,you told that you prefer oratory1990 target with 2 to 2. Got these for a Its not possible to EQ the HD650 to sound like HD800, T1 or LCD2. 4. HD660S has better imaging The EQ curve is based upon a few different sources I've found over the years online, as well as extensive listening tests with my own pair, and the suggested curves from Sonarworks and ToneBoosters for the HD600 (sometimes reverse engineered with DDMF PluginDoctor), and playing around with the Math Audio Headphone EQ. BUT the drivers in all of them start to distort at the point because, again, these are not bass headphones. You could probably EQ it to a similar curve as the 600. i think there's less treble than bass, but i think that's the senn veil . Because of this, I've been debating about picking up a HD600 or HD6XX, for home If my HD600's sub-bass can be saved with EQ, please let me know any advice you would have to make them punchy. The HD600 is notoriously lacking in sub bass, but Try EQ if you can bring out the bass on HD600. In comes the HD660S2. I have a Sennheiser HD 598. Interesting. PC Setup: SoundblasterX G6 DAC -> JDS Labs Atom Headphone Amp -> Hifiman HE400SE & Senn HD560s & HD800 & AKG K702 & Hifiman HE4XX & NAD HP50 & Senn HD600 all EQ'd to Harman Curve. For what I hear on HD600 I believe rtings. Check out my: - HD600 Bass recovery EQ Correction s / - Easy UES EQ Correction Still HD600 don’t extend into sub-bass very well. The HD600 doesn't really respond well to bass EQ and certainly not down to 20Hz like the HE4XX can But you might prefer the increase in bass also more, so no real loss there. This ensures that all frequencies are reproduced accurately and evenly, resulting in a I use EQ to bump the bass a bit, but the HD 600's distortion levels rise very quickly under ~200Hz with a distortion peak at ~40Hz (squarely in the sub-bass region), so I'm Few dB of bass boost by taste, a bit of broadband reduction of the area around 2. The HD 600 is so awesome, and certainly on my list for the future but I settled for the HD 360. Discussion The only thing I feel like they don't do super well is electronic music where bass is important. I also recommend you add a sub bass shelf to see if it improves the sound further. It's defiantly less figuring, but not what I'm use to hearing, as gutiars and vocals feel gutted. After adjusting I seem to be getting more bass which is good, but would this be a bad solution to the sub-bass rolloff on the hd600? I If you go to this link to HD600 EQ Settings you can find EQ settings for both graphic and parametric EQs. Reply Vallenium 1Ω • Additional comment The HD600 has better overall timbre, more natural vocals, and just generally more body in the midrange. Post #12 of 45 DevilDog 1000+ Head-Fier. Neither is a bass cannon, though the HD800S has much tighter, faster bass. Unironically, despite the WH-1000XM3 sounding like close to trash, with heavy EQ + bass + ANC, it's still giving a slightly more immersive and epic Route the kick and bass the same way we did in the first method. Share Apr 14, 2006 at 9:03 PM. The bass is one of the regions where the HD 600 and HD 650 differ a fair bit and sets them apart from each other. Little to no bass boost over 1kHz is in fact an 'extreme' lack of bass (with the HD600/6506XX even having even less than this without EQ), as it's nowhere near representative of either a good speaker in a good room, nor the amount of Q1. Other than the subbass roll-off, the bass on the HD 600 is actually not that bad. 65 This is an HD 600 driver vibrating with the bass from Hood Go Crazy by Tech N9ne. If you want to hear bass drops go all they way down, you'll be able to hear that on closed dynamic headphones like the Shure SRH840A, AKG K371 (if the cups seal properly), 250-ohm Beyer DT-770, AudioTechnica M50X, Sony MDR-7506, the discontinued In terms of capabilities after eq, it varies by headphones, using my 58x as an example, i thought that the bass was lacking when i first got it. You can try to tune the sound profile to slight v-shape to see if that creates fake soundstage. You also can EQ the Sundara’s bass to your heart’s extent, not so much on the 560S. Comfort is great on both. 7 dB, it automatically rounds up to either 4. Some EQ can help but it won't be the same experience as good closed backs with the bass. You can keep the muddiness factor in mind when boosting, which I didn't have any problem with. Plug the AKG K371 into anything, there's more deep bass, doesn't need eq down there unless you might want less bass. EQ settings are This addresses two of the main issues: the weak low end and the upper mid resonances. Both sound good with almost any source, but benefit significantly from a good DAC and amplification. Or else they are too bright with the 8k peak. Joined Nov 19, 2021 Posts 102 Likes 33 Location Russian. HD660S has significantly improved imaging and separation. Joined Jul 29, 2021 Messages 1,595 Likes 1,100. ATH-R70x seem to be more general. It will be a bit underwhelming with those tracks as there’s not much sub-bass. So here I am for maybe some tips on how to get better bass, or see how you guys have the settings. HD58x has more and better bass extension, but also worse overall timbre and treble response. I made a mild EQ based on rtings. The HD650 digs the deepest and has a very good amount of slam, probably helped by the greater mid-bass hump. I actually used u/metal571's EQ settings and adjusted it a bit to my preferences. Mac EQ is poor and insufficient for headphones in general. Reply aguskapos 9 Ω • Additional comment actions. To me, the HD600 also sounds a bit grainy in the treble compared to the DT 1990. I am not necessarily endorsing Beats I currently own the Sennheiser 569's and the Sennheiser HD Pro 300, the 569's are good for casual listening with some bass and the 300's produce a ton of sub bass response but it can be overwhelming, I'm looking to sell the pair and invest in the Sennheiser HD 600's but I read in other threads and forums the 600's somewhat lack in sub bass, and These slight drawbacks outweigh what I believe to be what the HD600’s are missing, as I believe they give the headphones a much needed personality compared to the more bland neutrality of the HD 600’s. I add a 6-8db low shelf at about 60-80hz. You have to EQ to get more bass. The HD650/6XX was already fantastic, but after applying his EQ I’m honestly blown away. Sundara will have DAC/amp bass boost vs software EQ bass boost Home. Hi-65 are pretty decent and overall So this would be an easier choose for me especially as I do feel the HD600 needs EQ in the sub-bass region for lots of songs while the HD490 Pro does not. I’ve auditioned the HD600 for a long time at home. 3 and out of the box, the graph kinda looks more like the HD650, actual sound more like the HD650 on old pads. The woes with the bass of HD600 can be fixed with EQ, if you really prefer it that way. What I suggest if you want to EQ is boost it by no more than like 4 or 5dB, and try doing so with a peak filter rather than a shelf filter, since that could also be elevating the mid or upper bass. The mid and highs on my Sennheiser hd600 are perfect balance between being enjoyable and non fatiguing for me. Per default it is set to an increment of 0. The pads muffle the sound. The bass response is incredibly textured and well nuanced and the EQ profile I have for its bass is perfect for me. My sundara's are amazing for the detail and soundstage and imaging but it sounds too bright, even with some EQ. This is the best I’ve ever heard headphones sound, full stop! They always had a full midrange and lush vocals, but this EQ manages to expand the highs and lows without losing any of that midrange thickness. Equipment Forums. Quite a few people EQ these to bring up the bass. I'm quite certain that bass distortion is not a problem if you use it at stock, but EQ'ing up the bass doesn't give the great well defined bass that some headphones can offer, even my AKG K702 open backed headphone The HD600 take EQ well so you should be able to increase their bass without killing the rest of the frequencies. The mids sound ok but the treble is overpowering the music. My perfect eq would sound more like hd600 with linear bass from a planar. When boosting highs Maybe I would miss some bass, making electronic music (I do not consider myself a "bass head" though"). They require some EQ to add just enough bass to appropriate level. To my ears, the HD 600 always wins in this match-up. Beautiful full sound with a very nice bass underlining to make sound rich. But EQ is not a replacement for good audio gear - it's the icing on Bass: Overall, the Sundara have better bass. I've implemented it If you want bass, either EQ the bass by 10db or buy something else other than sennheiser. I think overall it's easier to boost bass with EQ rather than boosting highs with EQ. anyone knows about such plugin? of coarse Filter Settings Filter Type Frequency Gain Q-Factor BW Band 1 LOW_SHELF 105 Hz 5,0 dB 0,71 adjust gain of filter band 1 to preference (bass level) Band 2 PEAK 125 Hz -3,6 dB 0,45 2,76 Deviation from Target adjust gain of filter band 10 to preference (airiness) Band 3 PEAK 1310 Hz -2,1 dB 1,7 0,84 Before EQ After EQ Bottom line : nobody has been able to really differentiate 600 and 650 after EQ, so you could just get whichever is the cheapest one in your country. Here's the preset (TDR's Slick EQ M) that I picked up from Gregg Janman to get them flat. The Decware ZTM3 amp delivers the best sound I've heard Yesterday I was messing around with the EQ and I liked it way more when I made them sound more bassy. The thing with the DT 990 is: It has a fairly big amount of bass for a HiFi range open back headphone and a decent soundstage, so it's a great choice for things like movies or gaming. jtj tnnbn rzhzhh xsv livi just cyuzs uqyzby fwn llp