Awaiting reviewer selection example thesis. Finally, the last status is the one most relevant to you.

Awaiting reviewer selection example thesis So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. 21, awaiting AE decision. pdf), Text File (. Mega Nav. Peer-reviewing an academic manuscript is not an easy task. I am really “Awaiting Referee Scores” is a stage in the publication process where enough experts have agreed to read and evaluate a manuscript. I'm curious if we are still waiting for reviewers to accept the review of the manuscript, like Awaiting Reviewer Invitation, or it's different, and the reviewing Admin processing consists of checking the manuscript for plagiarism, language usage and verifying the structure of the manuscript according to the guide for authors. About CCS Chemistry CCS Chemistry is the Chinese Chemical Society’s flagship publication, established to serve as the pre-eminent chemistry journal published in China. I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. Awaiting Reviewer Selection: Selection of suitable reviewers by the editor Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The reviewers have been selected and are awaiting acceptance to review The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. The Awaiting CE/Reviewer Scores status also means that the AE has assigned the basic number of peer reviewers required for the manuscript, either two or three. I have previously published in the same journal Awaiting Reviewer Selection: The editor is trying to find suitable reviewers for your revised manuscript. The Action Editor may decide to make a decision without allocating reviewers. Since then, the article has been jumping between "Waiting for Reviewer Assignment" and "Contacting Potential Reviewers" (10 changes of status now). If you Popular Articles. It is slightly strange that the status changed to “awaiting Ed decision” in a week’s time. If the RE thinks it is worthy, they assign reviewers. So, the manuscript is out to all two or three reviewers, who will get back with their For example, let’s imagine that your research paper is stuck ‘awaiting reviewer comments’ and two months have passed with no news from the journal. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". In addition to those general ratings and an overall mark of the thesis paper, the expert reviewer also pointed out the 446 THEORY AND PRACTICE IN LANGUAGE STUDIES For Example, Generic thesis statement: Many college athletes, such as those playing for the NCAA, don’t get paid. We see that this article is ‘awaiting reviewer comments Review complete: This is the largest variance part because some reviewers agree to review but don’t actually submit one, some reviewers decline, some reviewers never respond to the invitation, and so on. If it passes it may be assigned to a subject matter expert Review Editor, who does another desk review. If it is not a desk reject, then it will surely go to the external peer-reviewers for review. So, good job there! :) As you can see, nothing much is needed from your side for Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This means that the AE has gone through the manuscript, and based on the factors mentioned above, decided to send it for peer review, and is therefore, now looking out for suitable I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. Does it mean the work will be rejected? Meaning of quick change from Awaiting Reviewer Selection The EiC indicator is simpler: it tells you who the Editor-in-Chief is. Reviewer Guidelines for CCS Chemistry 1 Section 1. 403k 88 88 gold badges 25 days ago, i submitted a paper to a high-profile journal that uses the ScholarOne submission system. After some days, the status of the paper was changed from Submitted to Journal to AWAITING REFEREE SELECTION. Just ignore your paper for few months (of course, depends on your fields. It has now been three months since I submitted the revisions. Reviewer selection and invitation. Examples of reviewer comments can help!Here you can find an overview of sample comments and examples I made all necessary changes recommended by reviewers and resubmitted the paper about 12 days ago. 20, awaiting reviewer scores, should be under review. The Handbook provides you with: • A guide to the various ways in which you can search for potential reviewers You should fully address to the feedback of all reviewers whatever their comments, question, suggestion etc. A sudden Answer: The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. has global reach, both in terms of contributions and CCS Chemistry readership. Improve this question. ' It has been a month now, but the status has not changed. However, if the status before this was “awaiting reviewer selection”, it implies that the manuscript has successfully cleared the editorial screening stage and now the editorial board is in process of finding suitable peer reviewers for your paper. To do this via the system: Click ‘External Searches' Select the criteria you would like to search for and then select the platform that you wish to I submitted a manuscript to a journal, and the status changed from Awaiting Reviewer Selection to Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation. , 2020). The fact that you are apparently seeing Reviewer Invited: If the manuscript is suitable for peer review, this step indicates that the editor is searching for viable peer reviewers. Up to now, 11 weeks passed but the status is still AWAITING REFEREE SELECTION. Can you please explain what it is going on? Reviewers 2 and 3 agreed to accept the revised version, but reviewer 1, who originally rejected the manuscript, raised a few additional questions regarding the other two reviewers' comments, after being satisfied with my responses to their questions. The former is a vague term that could mean anything: reviewer has been invited, reviewer has agreed to review, maybe even reviewer has submitted a review but there're other reviewers who have not yet completed their reviews. It could mean, for example, that the editor sent it out to the reviewers, but one or more have not submitted their reviews, thus causing the system to continue showing "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". What is meant by awaiting reviewer selection after being under review in scholar one online submission system? This means that the Editor is looking for suitable reviewers for your article. Awaiting reviewer scores Reviewers are working on their reviews. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: If all the reviewers from the last round are invited, they should be kept in the same order. After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to ‘Reviewer selection,’ then ‘Reviewer assignment’, then ‘Reviewer selection’, and then ‘Reviewer assignment’ again. 10 AE reviewing, Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2022. . I submitted my manuscript to a journal. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it Their extraordinary contributions have greatly improved the quality of this thesis paper. ' However, I'm · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Selection: Article is undergoing the preliminary evaluation · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Article is undergoing the peer review, and is waiting for the acceptance of its evaluator(s) · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Article is undergoing the peer review, and one or both of the To get a second opinion, they have referred the manuscript both to the ME and to the peer reviewers. Use your position as an editorial member to point out the The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. The status of the paper changed several times. View all unanswered Q&As. We did not download the names or contact information of reviewers or authors, manuscript title, or manuscript abstract to minimize the likelihood that members of the For example, I have attached one of our recent responses to a reviewer. Handling editors are responsible for overseeing a manuscript’s peer review. Review Settings . I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. These choices will be saved in your account and apply to all submissions. Publication Success How can I proofread my thesis for journal submission? View all unanswered Q&As. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review sample selection and what pitfalls there are to avoid remain scarce (Paul & Criado, 2020; Williams et al. The first process ( Awaiting Reviewer Invitation ) means looking for suitable reviewers to invitate While the second process ( Awaiting Reviewer Assignmet) means suitable reviewers has been found Scenario 2: awaiting reviewer selection>> under review If this was the way the status had changed, then it is possible that the online status tracking software uses the status "awaiting reviewer selection" to indicate that the paper is At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. While one of the reviewers recommended acceptance, another reviewer recommended Major Revision. Not necessarily. ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means that your manuscript has cleared the desk screening and is now ready to be sent for peer review. 2023-4-25 awaiting reviewer selection 2023-4-25 in peer review process 2023-4-29 awaiting reviewer scores 2023-7-18 awaiting final decision 2023-7-31 major revision 2023-8-12 revision submitted 2023-8-14 awaiting reviewer scores 2023-8-31 awaiting final decision 2023-9-4 accept This journal requires no more than 15 figures and tables. Okay, it has been sent for review again. 6. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? Clearly it is, as your example illustrates. Does it mean the paper has been sent for peer review or is it still eligible for desk rejection? Please advise. The first read is used to form an initial impression of the work. Skip to main content Ask a Question. I revised and resubmitted the manuscript within two weeks of receiving the reviewers’ comments. That 2022. For 2 weeks, the submission status was showing ‘Awaiting admin processing’. Your article meets the Journal’s scope and has been approved for peer review. This status is rather uncommon Submitted on October 27th last year, it has been revised twice. The following guide is a useful reference for The Permanente Journal peer reviewers, and provides helpful suggestions for how to effectively complete the review process. ). This is because once reviewers are After submission, the status changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Perhaps one reviewer (or two, in case the manuscript was sent to more than Awaiting Reviewer Selection: Less than 4 reviewers have been selected for a manuscript. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". After 20 days, status has changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. View Forum Guidelines. An overlay window will appear where you can make your choices and use the for example, if i want to say that my system is stable on the basis of X theorem or X lemma (which is proven or stated by others) is it valid? Awaiting allocation: The paper has been assigned to the Editor but has not yet been sent to reviewers (however, the Editor may have assigned the manuscript to an Associate Editor – there is no separate system status to indicate this). ” From there, follow the prompts to select and officially invite that reviewer through the A PhD reviewer (rapporteur de thèse in French) is required to be a recognized expert in the domain of the PhD, and either be an associate professor or full professor (tenured), or a faculty member with HDR in France (HDR = a second thesis), or have an equivalent senior position (senior scientist/researcher in a lab of a company for example). 2, the assignment result of reviewers to papers determines the expertise of the reviewer who will review the paper, hence it is the crucial step in the whole peer review process. Follow بعد از آن مجددا به Awaiting Referee Selection تغییر کرده است. For most manuscripts, in the Awaiting Reviewer Selection. The status, "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" indicates that the preliminary checks have been completed and that the manuscript is now ready to be sent to the select reviewers and will be sent once the reviewers are finalized. It can be clearly seen that the reviewer’s comments helped us to significantly improve the quality of the manuscript. ’ But this could be because the associate editor (AE) may have had a challenge finding reviewers for your manuscript. Awaiting Reviewer Selection: The editor is trying to find suitable reviewers for your revised manuscript. 12. Once enough reviewers have been selected, I submitted my manuscript five weeks ago, and in a week, the status appeared as 'Awaiting Reviewer Selection. the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. I As for your question about the “awaiting reviewer selection” status, please note that this status indicates that the journal editor is looking for peer reviewers for your paper, which means that your manuscript has cleared desk • Invite Reviewers: Manuscripts where reviewers have been selected, but have not been invited • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. Awaiting Reviewer Selection Dec 3, 2015 9:59:30 GMT -5 . The statuses I've seen are: Awaiting Reviewer Selection, Awaiting Third Opinion, Awaiting Screener Assignment, and Awaiting Second Opinion. The latter is a clear term that means reviewers have agreed to review the article, but have not provided a report yet. 2 Step1: Awaiting Examiner Selection Figure 8: Dashboard Screen 4. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned For example, (i) Manuscript Submitted may be same with Undergoing Initial Checking, (ii) Reviewers Invited may be same with Reviewers Assigned, (iii) Under Review may be same with Awaiting Reviewer Scores, Awaiting Referee Daily routine: a study This PhD thesis takes a closer look at the apparent paradox of daily routine. Wait! It is not late yet. I would like to express my gratitude to the following organizations and individuals for their invaluable The reviewer sets time aside to read the paper several times. After submission, the status changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. The editor decides whether your paper fits the aims and scope of the journal, then select the reviewers and guide the From the “Select Reviewers” page, find the “Create Reviewer Account” box. We value your expertise in the area and your opinion on the manuscript you review, including its quality, novelty, and importance. However, since the journal only accepts one round of revisions, the manuscript was rejected. Awaiting Reviewer Selection - assigned to an editor, and waiting بعد از آن مجددا به Awaiting Referee Selection تغییر کرده است. The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. This is a long period, what are your recommendations? NB: Follow up email sent twice in the previous week The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. View A paper submitted on the 28th of Feb has been on 'awaiting reviewer selection' to date. A few days ago, the status changed from 'Awaiting reviewer response' to 'Awaiting reviewer scores. Awaiting Editor Assignment - ready to be sent to an appropriate editor. can anyone help me explain the meaning of the negative value 17 The Invite Reviewers Menu is found on the left side of the Reviewer Selection Summary Page and is divided into sections:. Specificity: It addresses a specific aspect of The section includes the following: overall analysis and integration of the research and conclusions of the thesis in light of current research in the field conclusions regarding goals or hypotheses of the thesis that were presented in the Awaiting reviewer selection AE invites at least two reviewers. The associate Awaiting reviewer selection AE invites at least two reviewers. Note that an Edit link appears here only if you have permission to adjust the The status “Awaiting reviewer selection” seems to indicate that the manuscript cleared the initial editorial screening. Further, if you are thinking of sending an email to them, then I would say, don't. Click on “View Submission” to view the paper. I have contacted to Editorial Office several but the result is Today it went back to "awaiting reviewers scores" What do you think that means? publications; peer-review; journal-workflow; Share. 24 Major revision (3 reviewers, 18 comments) Smile执着 2023-01-18 Hello, may I ask how much is the layout fee for this journal? Thank you. 2 DIGITS, IISc 4. " Related reading: Why Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This is ideally the first stage of the peer review process where the assigned Editor will select some suitable experts to invite to review your manuscript. If, for example, claims are made about cross-linguistic influence from a particular language X I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. 14, awaiting reviewer selection. Follow answered Apr 1, 2015 at 8:59. The hello everybody, I am a student who is about to begin her thesis. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review", the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation Search options can only be set here, on the Reviewer selection Summary page, rather than the search results page. 1. 11. It then moved to ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’ and stayed at that stage for 9 days. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review", the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". • Invite Reviewers: Manuscripts where reviewers have been selected, but have not been invited • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received responses from multiple peer reviewers and is presently in the process of making a selection among them. My status has changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Score" to "Awaiting AE Recommendation" and has been in this status I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. Manuscript changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to " awaiting AE reccommendation" to "awaiting EIC decision" (select reviewers or decline without review) within a week of being assigned a paper, but it often takes longer. What does it mean? Does it mena that one of reviewers was The status of your "submitted manuscripts" is indicated by one the following stages: With Editorial Office - successfully submitted and ready to be checked by the Editorial Office. It said awaiting reviewer selection for 3 weeks. The Editorial Team are in the process of finding suitable external expert reviewers that are available to review your article. This document is a thesis presented to the Faculty of Architecture Department at De La Salle University – Dasmariñas by Ronie The acknowledgements section is your opportunity to thank those who have helped and supported you personally and professionally during your thesis or dissertation process. The review process is fast, hoping for a good result. But today I noticed that the status changed again and it says 'Awaiting Reviewer Agreement'. The article is quite technical and multidisciplinary, so I understand that finding reviewers is hard. However, if the status is “Awaiting reader selection,” it would mean something completely different. Especially if you are unsure about how to formulate your feedback. patience is key Guest. آیا مقاله من برای داوری رد شده است؟ اکنون، پس از امتیازات داور و پس از انتظار، وضعیت “Awaiting Reviewer Scores” و “Awaiting Final Decision “را با هم نشان می دهد I submitted a paper to a high-level journal (3rd) that uses the SholarOne system. The degree of daily routine during the workweek is calculated using time-use survey data from Recently, I have submitted a mathematical paper to a journal published by Taylor & Francis. This is a specific substep of the review cycle. Click on “Take Action. Awaiting reviewer assignment Reviewers decide if they accept or decline the invitation (in the second case AE invites another reviewer). Anyway, they seem to have found the required number of peer reviewers now, and your manuscript is presently in I received a mail about five hours after submission stating: It is a pleasure to inform you that your manuscript titled XYZ has passed initial screening and is now awaiting reviewer selection. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. That would mean the editor I submitted a manuscript to a journal by SAGE. It has been 1. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? “awaiting reviewer selection” is automatic and does not indicate a re-submission. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review", the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation So, we have made some edits/assumptions. 7. I received a mail in mid-February that the paper has passed initial screening and is awaiting reviewer selection. And that the Editor has decided to proceed without the missing review(s), and consider only the reviews he did receive. 18 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2022. As the deadline of the thesis defense is Is one month a long time to wait for the reviewer scores? It is a bit long, but the delay could be because not all the reviewer scores have come in. Should I be worried? Is there anything I can do to Review and selection of manuscripts. Ask a question. What is meant by awaiting reviewer selection after being under review in scholar one online submission system? Negative result on natural product sample cholinergic assay? i have been doing cholinergic assay on natural product and for some of the samples, i get negative value for the inhibition activity. آیا مقاله من برای داوری رد شده است؟ هنگامی که مقاله ارسال می‌شود، سردبیر آن را بررسی و ارزیابی می‌کند. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned If you are a higher education student, you will certainly need to write one or more theses during your academic journey. I submitted a paper of mine to an Emerald journal. It is nice that your journal's status descriptions are so detailed: it is much easier to understand what's going on Instructions for reviewers . Now the status has changed to ‘Awaiting ED recommendation’. Sample Acknowledgement Example 2. Authors have 30 days to review and return their manuscript following reviewer and associate editor comments. I received a mail that all required reviews have been completed and the editor’s decision is awaited. Finally, the status now is awaiting final decision since a week. Follow edited Sep 12, 2022 at 19:10. This Reviewer Selection Handbook aims to minimise the number of invites an editor must send for each manuscript and improve time to decision for our authors. Log In/Register. Today, the status changed to Awaiting Decision. 5, awaiting AE However, after reviewers completed their assignments, the authors do respond to queries raised by such reviewers, it could be once or a series of reviewer-author responses. Finally, the editor in As can be inferred from Fig. 3 Step 2: Awaiting Examiner Selection Figure 9: View Manuscripts Screen 1. 15-6. Finally, the last status is the one most relevant to you. There were three reviewers. I need to know whether the GHQ-12 is a public domain or do I require permission to use it? All the reviewer reactions follow the same pattern, listing the evaluations in terms of topic selection, significance of the topic, research ability and normalization of the thesis paper. How can I check the status of my submitted paper? Modified on Fri, 27 Oct 2023 at 04:59 PM. Conflict of Interest: You'll see this status at the start and end of the review cycle. Sorry! nothing found for. Maybe. Select the Assign Examiners option from the drop-down list as shown in Figure 9. Even though they should because of how hard they work and the money their sports bring to the A month ago, I submitted my paper to the Emerald journal, which uses the ScholarOne manuscript system. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but Regularly select reviewers from outside of Sage Track and add them to the database. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review", the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation I submitted my manuscript which was also the basis of my thesis in the beginning of June and it underwent peer review. Not sure if the previous reviewer rejected it or had conflicting opinions, need to include a review comment. 努力努力最努力 2022-09-17 Hello, I would like to ask, how long does it take from awaiting decision to the editor giving you feedback? 霍金斯 2022-09-14 I have submitted two articles, and it took two months for both of them to be reviewed. Improve this answer. Related reading: Does the status 'Awaiting Reviewer Selection' mean that the manuscript has passed desk rejection by the editor? Awaiting Reviewer Selection. If you struggle to communicate with your thesis supervisor via It included: manuscript ID, submission date, reviewer ID, reviewer country of residence, editor final decision (if available), reviewer comments to the editor, and reviewer comments to the authors. Under review: The paper is with reviewers for comment or waiting The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers by appropriate control groups. Awaiting AE recommendation The paper received the sufficient number of reviews Meaning when the manuscript's status changes from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting AE decision" after one day. Each time I invite new 2024-08-02: Awaiting EIC Recommendation, Major Revision 2024-09-02: Resubmitted, Awaiting Admin Processing 2024-09-03: Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 2024-09-11: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2024-09-16: Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 2024-09-17: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2024-12-04: Awaiting EIC Decision 2024-12-04: Accept The journal is very good, and the My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. Does it mean the work will be rejected? Authorship for a thesis being submitted to a journal . Add a comment | -1 . Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to Via the Associate Editor Dashboard, click on the “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” queue. Soon after submission, the Checklist: How to use your Thesis Statement. The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. Buffy. Option 2: Review the changes yourself without inviting any reviewers. 26, awaiting reviewer scores. Recall that AEs of most journals are volunteers who have other jobs, go on trips, and have many other What stage normally follows the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? I've reviewed papers for journals, but this is the first paper I've submitted to a peer-reviewed journal. Once the review invitations are sent, the status changes to "Reviewers invited. If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and "Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation" means the reviewers have not agreed to review the manuscript yet. txt) or view presentation slides online. If major problems are found at this stage, the reviewer may feel comfortable rejecting the paper without further If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and "Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation" means the reviewers have not agreed to review the manuscript yet. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, and the Awaiting Reviewer Selection. It status changed very quickly from 'Awaiting Reviewer Selection' to 'Awaiting Reviewer Scores'. این مرحله را می‌توان به عنوان «Awaiting AE assignment ARCH 070 2014 - Free download as PDF File (. Three weeks ago, I submitted my paper to a social sciences journal with impact factor. Secondly, it is probable the assigned Sourcing reviewers can be the most time-consuming part of an editor’s role. The paper has been assigned the minimum amount of reviewers However, if one or more reviewers decline the invitation (because they have a conflict of interest or are busy with other engagements), the status will change back to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" and the editor will have to look for more reviewers. Role of the journal editor. A sign that such insights would be desirable is that many review articles in However, finally he/she seems to have found the requisite number of reviewers and sent out review invitations to them. Authorship for a thesis being submitted to a journal . This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to invite to review. ” Scroll down to see the results returned from Referee Locator* or to search for Are you sure the status is “Awaiting reader selection” and not “Awaiting reviewer selection”? If it’s the latter, you can rest assured that your paper has cleared the initial editorial screening. The status on the manuscript central remained unchanged till mid-May. Perhaps, if this continues for some time without changing, you may want to consider writing to the journal editor seeking clarity. 5, awaiting AE I was requested to make revisions for my manuscript's format. Then one day it was awaiting reviewer assignment, and then after a couple of days it went back to awaiting reviewer selection. A manuscript typically gets a desk review by the Editor-in-Chief. Is this not backwards? Thank you, Sara. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. For example, reviewer #2 in the last round will still be reviewer #2 in the new round. I am really confused, can I contact the journal to You'll see this status at the start and end of the review cycle. That's the best choice. Select 'My Reviewer Display Preferences ' to set default filters and sort order for search results. But, while the RE is deciding, the software I'm familiar with defaults to "Assigning reviewers". “awaiting reviewer selection” is automatic and does not indicate a re-submission. 5 months with no change in status. As an expert reviewer you contribute to the integrity of research and the exacting standards of SLEEP. they forwarded regarding you work (PhD thesis). I submitted a manuscript in mid-January 2021. Manuscripts may be released if revisions are not received, and the paper will have to be sub-mitted as a new manuscript. user32537 user32537. The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. The thesis or dissertation cover page is the first point of contact with your reviewer. View Forum Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. Provide first and last names and email address and click “Create and Add. When the system shows the status “Reviewer invited,” it means that invitations have It it is desk reject, then reviewer means the editor herself. Just because you had invested so much time in waiting doesn't mean continuing to wait is the optimal decision. Position: If your statement is for an argumentative or persuasive essay, or a dissertation, ensure it takes a clear stance on the topic. In Coming to your present query, as we just indicated, this has been a slow change from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘Under Review. Thesis or dissertation acknowledgements The Chartered Association of Business Schools has released its comprehensive guide, making it easier than ever for researchers to search, sort, and filter journals by title, field, grade, and Step-by-Step Reviewer Instructions. Share. ‘Dear Editor: I am writing on behalf of my co-authors to enquire about the status of our paper submitted on x date, entitled y’. As stated by Rodriguez, Bollen, and Van de Sompel (2007): “one of the first and potentially most important stage is the one that attempts to distribute submitted . IISc Automated PhD Thesis Processing| Dean User Guide Page 8 of 13 Date: 24-August-2017Document Version: 1. A good thesis requires good communication between you and your thesis supervisor. Awaiting AE Assignment - checked and approved for processing. Improve this For example: The reviewer should have no prior knowledge of the submission; The reviewer should not have recently (COPE recommend 3 years) collaborated with any of the authors; Selecting reviewers from areas where duplicate Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Hoping for good news and praying for a speedy acceptance! For example, one reviewer asked to extend the literature review in my research, which was not applicable due to the way I designed and executed my research, so I illustrated the detailed justifications for my point of view. It depends on whether the editor invites new reviewers. This includes emails! Yet, even a simple email can lead to stress and overthinking. online-publication; Share. Additionally, after the revised The status change from “awaiting referee selection” to “awaiting ED decision” means that peer reviewers were selected to review your manuscript and have sent their comments to the journal editor, who will now have to take the final decision on your manuscript (Accept, Revise, or Reject). "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should be very brief, on the order of a few minutes. Answer. The reviewer sets time aside to read the paper several times. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but I submitted an article 5 months ago to a journal. It catches their 6. More specifically, though: You are looking for all sorts of formal reasons why the paper might have been rejected, or maybe why they wrongly rejected it. Awaiting AE recommendation The paper received the sufficient number of reviews How long does the status of "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" for your paper last? I have also submitted mine for half a month now. After the second revision, one reviewer accepted it, one reviewer made minor revisions, and one reviewer made major revisions. Because ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means Reviewers are not aware of the author’s identity, and you will not know the identity of the reviewers. To check the status of your submission in o If this status is updated soon after submission, it could mean a desk rejection. However, on the same day, the Firstly, the conflicting decisions of the assigned reviewers can lead to changing the status to "selecting reviewers" or "awaiting reviewer assignment". Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received responses from multiple I submitted a paper to a journal of Emerald Publishing. For instance, it’s not clear if the initial status was ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ or whether there was some other status prior to that. My personal guideline was to invite new reviewers if the previous reviewer had gone seven days without answering the invitation. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, Awaiting reviewer score, it has been sent out to selected reviewers and is still awaiting for their scores (comments). If major problems are found at this stage, the reviewer may feel comfortable rejecting the paper without further For example, the cover letter should be used to highlight any online material, explain requests for non-preferred reviewers and editors, list any companion manuscripts or related earlier manuscripts, give details of student 6. It was sent back for further revisions on May 29th. However, I definitely remember the last two: In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding reviewers for your paper. 14 AE reviewing, Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 2022. A plausible guess is that the editorial software uses "awaiting reviewer selection" to mean that the manuscript has been received but has not been sent to a reviewer. The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a couple of weeks and now today the status is "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". pykzs vhweo mmqso hiry scmc oyl cgkgzk ryto pycu ndufobk